View Single Post
Old 03-21-2024, 05:58 PM   #7
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,694
Karma: 169712392
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
The difference between Sigil 1.9 and Sigil 2.0 is likely due to the different QT version using and how it handles combining glyphs.

Since the Uthman font does seem to have the characters you want in the Arabic Presentation area ( specifically U+FC00 to U+FD1D and U+FD50 to U+FD7D ), it might be worth trying to use those glyphs directly. I generated the hex font names and dumped them into your test epub. Oddly, when I did a mend and prettify, the glyphs displayed in the Sigil code view do not match those glyphs when seen in Preview but do have some semblance to the components of the glyph shown in FontForges Glyph Info => Components.
Attached Files
File Type: epub uthmanic_modded.epub (148.6 KB, 463 views)
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote