Quote:
Originally Posted by Harmon
Actually, if you think about it, that could be seen as pointing to the exact opposite conclusion. He made sure that the jury itself was unbiased. That doesn't seem like the work of a biased judge...
|
OR, it could be beautiful stroke of misdirection on his part to allow him to insert his own biases and conflicts of interest smack dab into the ruling. Hmmm...
What bothers me is all the apologists who're willing to not question his motives.
Derek