View Single Post
Old 02-18-2024, 09:57 AM   #37090
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 779
Karma: 10535853
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
I'll bite. How? Seriously, what sort of negative do you think you can prove?
I'm with ApK here - that generalised claim always really annoys me too. Sure, there are some negatives you can't prove, but there are many positives you can't prove either. Many (most?) assertions can be phrased in a positive or negative way - does that change their provability?

Consider the assertion: "there are no two integers such that one divided by the other yields the square root of two". Clearly a negative assertion, but trivially provable.

Whenever I've had this argument with anyone, it quickly reduces to a weaker assertion: "there's a subset of negative assertions which are unprovable". No argument there, but it's not what the original claim states.
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote