View Single Post
Old 02-05-2024, 05:24 PM   #2417
maddz
Wizard
maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.maddz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,412
Karma: 30039536
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: UK
Device: Kobo Forma, Icarus, iPad Mini 2, Kobo Touch, Google Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth View Post
Joan of Arc wore "male" style armour because women warriors did, if they wore armour and were warriors (not many were by then). Vikings and a thousand years earlier, Celts had women warriors. They didn't wear bikinis.

The English claim that Joan of Arc wore men's clothes was disingenuous. It was a fake trial.
From what I recall reading around the subject, the main indictment was that she wore men's clothing. However, under canon law it was acceptable to do so as a defence against rape: so a woman traveller or a woman in a male setting was allowed to wear men's clothing while she was in that situation, but she had to return to women's clothing once she left that setting.
maddz is offline   Reply With Quote