View Single Post
Old 04-25-2009, 12:54 PM   #634
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleDe View Post
Interesting. Putting errors back in the text to match a paper edition is not my idea of what I prefer to read.
I like it, because it reflects the English usage of the period. Would you re-write Shakespeare in "modern" English? Austen's English is sufficiently old that personally I think that it should be read in its original spellings, which, indeed, are what most "reputable" printed editions (Oxford World Classics, Penguin Classics, etc) use. Someone has gone through the PG text (which I used previously) and "rationalised" the spelling, which I don't like. One is not then reading what Austen wrote.

However, as you very rightly say, each to his own .

What do other people think?

Last edited by HarryT; 04-25-2009 at 12:57 PM.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote