Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth
1. It's the capture, not the appearance of a line that counts, which is variable on them all.
2. It does matter. You can write as fast as you like on a Sage, then double tap and it's converted. You can't do either of those on a reMarkable.
3. Visible response varies with firmware and possibly other issues I don't understand. It would be easy to make multiple videos and pick best for some models and worst for other models. The YouTube review isn't accurate (being polite).
My experience is it's increasingly hard to get accurate honest reviews and ones on YouTube are the worst. Mostly they exist out of ego or to get revenue and most by people unqualified to do the review or clueless./
|
I'm not sure what you are saying here? Do you mean that while there might be a lag in the lines appearing on a Sage/Elipsa the actual registering of the stroke is faster than on wacom?
If so, what would that change? That you can scribble really fast and double tap to convert to text even before the lines have appeared?
The Boox devices also support conversion to text. How would using wacom make that slower?
Does any of this have any real world consequences? I mean lag between strokes and lines appearing can act distractingly, which is a negative real world consequence. I'm not sure it helps the user knowing that the technology actually has already registered his strokes, but is just slow showing them.