View Single Post
Old 10-28-2023, 04:48 AM   #3
Quoth
Still reading
Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Quoth's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,236
Karma: 105299897
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper
There is Victorian era typewriter markup. This uses *bold* and /italics/, though 'italics' and _italics_ are/were also used. The Typesetter was also supposed to figure ' " from context and also some typewriters had no 0 or 1, so O and I was used and changed by typesetter. The -omit this- became strikeout and sometimes _text_ meant heading, bold or underline, but many early typewriters had no _. Some had no ! and used l <backspace> . and the £ might sometimes be L <backspace> - or =, similarly for $ and Yen. The \ | ` ¦ ¬ { } [ ] ~ and all quotation marks were missing.

This led to Markdown and AsciiDoc

There is also BBCode (more typing, but more features as it's a subset of HTML using [ ] instead of < >, might as well use HTML/XML) and Wiki text. While Wiki text allows a lot of formatting, it thus has a longer learning curve.

There is also LaTex, but it's even more learning.

The USA IBM PC keyboard is based on a 1930s ASR Teletype (used for telegrams, telex, RTTY, punching morse tapes etc), which is why the @ was used for email, as early computers from 1940s to 1970s often used a teletype rather than CRT and keyboard.

Last edited by Quoth; 10-28-2023 at 05:04 AM.
Quoth is offline   Reply With Quote