View Single Post
Old 10-24-2023, 05:28 PM   #29
jackm8
Addict
jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jackm8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
jackm8's Avatar
 
Posts: 345
Karma: 3000000
Join Date: Nov 2015
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottischwenk View Post
This is correct for black and white - but incorrect for black/something; Black is always 300 ppi and as long as you think you recognize the "something" as white, it doesn't matter to the viewer
True, e-ink isn't Bayer array at all. Kaleido screens are basically two individual screens in one. Just like Foveon screens mentioned in that wikipedia article. They are stacked.
Spoiler:
Really unique tech, used on a few Sigma cameras. They're low resolution sensors that trade resolution for colour rendering. Plenty of shortcomings as well, from battery life to low light performance, so they're sidelined at the moment. A few links explaining them with some samples: https://petapixel.com/foveon-x3-image-sensor-explained/
https://www.mpb.com/en-us/content/ki...-foveon-sensor
First layer is 300p layer at the bottom, then over it, it's lower resolution transparent rgb layer. When colour isn't utilised that makes screen 300p, albeit white tones will be of more grayish look, as coloured filter can not be completely invisible, even when not in use.

Looking at this screen from mydeepguide's review of boox nova 3 color, it's plainly seen how this works. Coloured pixels are much larger, but are transparent. White spot pixels of bw array can still be seen under them. The same should go for black pixels as well, but they are not plainly visible in this sample. This possibly means that coloured filter has a very small, practically invisible effect on black content. It could also be that they're not seen from image quality uploaded.

It's a complex tech, and little is known how it actually works. I'm almost leaning towards it right now so I could just see how it functions in practice. How does the device decide whether to utilise 300p or lower resolution? Vectored fonts in pdf could go high resolution, but what if pdf text isn't rasterized, and includes coloured content, but is still in 300p resolution or higher. Would that downscale everything and display text at coloured resolution?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	5405cd_1562763ebaff4d7693adac83443cd5c0~mv2.jpg
Views:	221
Size:	453.9 KB
ID:	204414  
jackm8 is offline   Reply With Quote