Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiat_Lux
You can't shut the AIs down.
* Source code for one of the prototypes of ChatAI (i think. might have been the competitors) was inadvertantly leaked by the developers. Said source code is available on a website blocked by 75+ countries.
* At least one AI has been released with a GPL licence.
* Tom Swan _Pascal Programs For Business_ has an early version of code that generates text that sounds like the human that it was "trained on" writes.
If one is willing to the manual proofreading & OCR work, 10,000,000+ public domain/CC0 works are available for the asking, to use for training purposes.
|
Yes, exactly.
Vis the allegedly infamously hidden, sub-genre of sub-genre, in forbidden areas...yeah, well. My gut on that is a big "yeah, sure it was/is/does." I'm not critiquing you; just...I mean, we have this broadbrush claim that 79 or 89 out of 100 books--HARDLY some sub-genre of a sub-genre, etc. in YA novels were AI written. Eighty percent, basically. That comment that claim has
no dataset intersection, that I can see, what what you are discussing.
That claim, made during that video, is just (IMHO) made-up and repeated and regurgitated drivel. Which is my rather vociferous objection to it. Being flung around as "fact" by people who can barely spell fact, much less recognize one when it bites them in the ass.
Hitch