View Single Post
Old 04-22-2009, 01:06 PM   #71
Jellby
frumious Bandersnatch
Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Jellby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Jellby's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,550
Karma: 19500001
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spaniard in Sweden
Device: Cybook Orizon, Kobo Aura
Quote:
Originally Posted by hudson View Post
These include avoiding rivers, avoiding excessive word splitting, proper hyphenation, and microtype optimizations to create optically better alignment.
I don't think there's anything in (La)TeX to avoid rivers, other than a human operator checking the output and maybe tweaking the parameters. For the rest, I agree.

Quote:
The naive greedy algorithms used by most of the formats produces a definitely sub-standard layout.
I agree too, but the algorithms are implemented by the reader software. I doubt the formats have any specification for the line-breaking algorithm. In principle, an e-book reader program could use a TeX-like breaking algorithm, and would give definitely better output.
Jellby is offline   Reply With Quote