View Single Post
Old 04-22-2009, 10:17 AM   #1914
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,156
Karma: 315558334
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
It's worth bearing in mind that the 600dpi/1200dpi of laserprinters really is dpi - dots of black (toner) and white (paper), while the 180dpi of eInk is really 180ppi - pixels of black, dark grey, light grey or white, which is 'equivalent' to about 300dpi.

Of course, the 'equivalence' numbers are only a guide, and are more applicable to continuous tone images (e.g. photographs) than text.

For example, I'd much rather have 360ppi eInk at 4 grey levels (600dpi 'equivalent') than 180ppi at 16 grey levels (700dpi 'equivalent'), even thoug the latter has a higher dpi equivalent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenophon View Post
MUCH higher resolution would be wonderful. [...]
I'm one of those folks who is bothered by the difference between a good 600DPI laser printer and a good 1200DPI laser printer (emphasis on "good," as there may be no difference between units that aren't good). The ~180DPI res we have on current generation eInk readers is just barely sort-of kind-of acceptable.
pdurrant is offline