Quote:
Originally Posted by netseeker
To cite you: Whats your point? "They" appear to be right from my point of view. And more important: Why are you trying to answer to my rhetorical question? 
|
Why did you ask the rhetorical question? Just because you felt like it? Maybe I answered just because I felt like it.
So let me get this straight.....someone comes on here, claims I stated something I did not, then quotes a passage of mine that clearly demonstrates that what he claimed I stated was, whilst similar in content, was not what I actually stated, and you think this "right"? You have a funny definition of what is right but that is your prerogative.
Quote:
Originally Posted by netseeker
Because i'm interested in what other posters than you have to say.
|
Well here's an amazingly simple idea......
Why not try reading their posts and not mine? You can choose to do so you know.
Maybe that takes too much common sense though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by netseeker
See, you did it again. Once again somebody "should" do something in your opinion. Why should i argue against you? It seems to me that you are just interested in being right rather than in real arguing and accepting other peoples opinions.
|
So you have a problem with me suggesting others should do something but your replies to me suggest I should "accept that others disagree with you" and also suggest I should "make room for other posters".
So it's ok for you to tell me I should do something but not the other way around?
Maybe those more literate could help out here.......what's that word that describes someone who says one thing but does another or who has one set of standards for others and another set for themselves? Oh wait, I remember, a hypocrite.
Quote:
Originally Posted by netseeker
Unfortunately. Maybe it's time for me to test MRs "ignore list" feature...
|
Perhaps it is. Especially since you never even tried to engage me in an intelligent discussion but instead chose to be abusive and rude right from your very first post to me.
Cheers,
PKFFW