View Single Post
Old 08-15-2023, 08:58 PM   #67
colinsky
Addict
colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.colinsky ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
colinsky's Avatar
 
Posts: 240
Karma: 3500000
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: Sony PRS-300, PRS-T1, PRS-T3
Perhaps a bit off topic (and not solving the OP's actual problem that everyone seems to have ignored, which was about sequence numbering rather than the display of footnotes themselves)...

I recently read an Oxford University Press book which tried to get around the small-tap-area problem by not only linking the footnote anchor itself but a few words previous to it. This seemed a good compromise between the standard printed approach and a reasonable digital experience. (see attached)

Regarding the use of numbers -- I've had the problem of multiple unnumbered notes in a book (* or the like), where clicking on one took me to a page of multiple notes, without any clue as to which note was the specific one I was referencing. So numbers do provide some value, even in e-books...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	footnotes-page.png
Views:	926
Size:	128.0 KB
ID:	203168  
colinsky is offline   Reply With Quote