Well, they're not links in the original book, because it was published in 1998. And only on paper. I get what you mean - but my preferred solution (maybe I should say my "preferred reality"!) would be to add a link to the cross reference - "See Chapter 8, note 37" - and for that to point to the relevant note, which would be numbered "37", not 465, or whatever. I haven't consulted my client in detail on this - but I do know that preserving the original language and style of the original book, as much as possible, is a priority.
|