Thread: Kobo and Footnotes. Again.
View Single Post
Old 07-31-2023, 10:52 AM   #7
jeff47
Connoisseur
jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!jeff47 is faster than a rolling 'o,' stronger than silent 'e,' and leaps capital 'T' in a single bound!
 
Posts: 69
Karma: 50592
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kobo Libre H20
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackie_w View Post
I had a look at your sample epub3. I don't think there is anything wrong with the way you've coded your footnotes/endnotes.

The problem is with your NAV/NCX. Kobos (at least for kepubs) are very picky about TOCs. If you stick to the golden rule for NAV/NCX your Kobo reading life will run more smoothly. Make sure that there is a one-to-one relationship between HTML files in the epub and TOC entries in the NAV/NCX.
I'll have to try this too! Can we trust the nav/ncx generated by Sigil to be "sane"? Is there a way to test it? (and is the Golden Rule you mention a one-to-one relationship?)
jeff47 is offline   Reply With Quote