Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
A question for those people who are married:
It's a well-known fact that some people have a high sex-drive, and others don't. If you just weren't interested in sex, but your partner had a strong need for it, would you object to your partner going to see an escort for a purely "physical" experience with no emotional strings attacked?
Speaking as a single person, I can see nothing at all "wrong" with this, personally. It's simply providing a service, like any other service.
|
If for you sexual intimacy is just two or more bodies pleasuring eachother, I guess anything can be viewed the way you want. There's no moral or ethical compass, as you make the rules.
The religious view is well known. The more scientific view is also known: men are "wired" to spread their "seeds", so there's higher chance of offsprings and therefore survival. Women are more "attached" to a certain man, because they need protection and nurture, someone to help to raise a healthy son. They're the ones who will be pregnant 9 months and vulnerable for even longer time.
Bringing that notion to our days, I guess women feel cheated when the "cheat" means a threat to their own relationship: the husband might leave her or might not be as available a$ before, etc. The husband might feel cheated, because they might loose a "seed". Their partner might become pregnant of another male, etc. All this in an unconscious level, of course.
We can rationalize this but even then feel cheated, even if we try to tell ourselves it's not. I think as long as a person has feelings/emotions, he won't feel confortable with an escort satisfying physical needs of their partners. You can acept, you can endure... But I doubt there won't be any inner entropy about it.