View Single Post
Old 07-07-2023, 06:39 PM   #573
jhowell
Grand Sorcerer
jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jhowell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
jhowell's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,099
Karma: 92190113
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Device: Kindles
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsem View Post
repeats previous location
I have spent several weeks working on and off to understand how the Scribe derives the thickness and density adjustment factors from the more primitive data (x/y coordinates, tilt angle, and pressure applied.) Earlier this week I had a breakthrough and was able to exactly replicate the thickness and density of the hundreds of thousands of points in the Scribe notebook samples I have seen so far.

I did some more testing and that one notebook sample you provided (95E4A4423B184AE1B3DCF747F659B0CD!!PDOC!!notebook) breaks all of those rules. Do you have any idea what might be different about that notebook as compared with all of the other notebooks you have shared so far?

Last edited by jhowell; 07-07-2023 at 06:46 PM.
jhowell is online now   Reply With Quote