View Single Post
Old 07-06-2023, 12:14 PM   #219
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,664
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by nabsltd View Post
Unfortunately, there is a huge legal difference if the machine-readable form (e-book) was never released without DRM. The only way a machine learning system could be trained on such works is by defeating the DRM, and that's a copyright violation all by itself.
First off: no, defeating DRM is NOT a copyright violation all by itself. And second: even if it were, there are countless ways that a machine learning system could be trained on DRMed content (without defeating it).

And we're right back to no legal difference in my book. Not to mention being right back to needing to sue people over actual legal violations (piracy, DRM removal, etc...) rather than inventing legally irrelevant (in my opinion) differences between human and machine consumption/study.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote