View Single Post
Old 06-11-2023, 10:11 AM   #4
arjaybe
Wizard
arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.arjaybe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
arjaybe's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,071
Karma: 12500000
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Okanagan
Device: Sony PRS-650, Kobo Clara
Should a photographer be allowed to take credit for a picture created by a camera? How about a camera that makes automatic adjustments to improve the image? Or a camera that combines three images to create a better one? What if the photographer takes a picture of something made by another person, or many other people, like a cityscape? Should they be able to take credit for it, or do they need to make sure the credit is fairly distributed, and maybe paid for? It's a slippery slope when we let machines create art.
arjaybe is online now   Reply With Quote