View Single Post
Old 04-19-2009, 07:04 AM   #359
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow View Post
I'd suggest the NHS would qualify - e.g. their approach to co-payments.

"Many other patients have suffered as a result of the NHS not allowing co-payments – this being where a patient seeks to pay privately for a drug which is not funded by the NHS, whilst continuing to receive the basic NHS package of care.
But this is not allowed: if patients want to top up their care, Government policy means the NHS withdraws all free treatment."
I saw a news article recently, Sparrow, suggesting that this practice either had now been changed, or was in the process of being changed. I agree with you that it is unjust.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote