View Single Post
Old 05-22-2023, 09:02 PM   #51
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 47,125
Karma: 169815798
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by afv011 View Post
Sure thing, here's 20,000 years

https://xkcd.com/1732/
I get a laugh out of those charts showing what has been termed the hockey stick graph. You may have noted that the program that produced the original graph which was "liberated" during the 2009 "Climategate" hacking incident was found to produce virtually the same output regardless of the input values so the increase in temperature (actually CO2 levels) would go as near to asymptotic as possible.

Note that this has nothing to do with global warming. Given the level of well funded opposition to any suggestion that humans could affect the climate ("oil-soaked think tanks" was a favourite of mine), it's not all that surprising that both sides became polarized and there was little interest on the part of the East Anglia CRU into exposing anything that could cast doubt on their work.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote