Quote:
Originally Posted by SidJnsn
Even a cursory glance would have shown you that the problem I outlined was not addressed by the 65 release. My intent in sending you the code was only to show that the second call solves the problem.
If your intent is to alienate every grateful user who is trying to help, you're doing a great job.
Maybe you will find this more "relevant" and "of value":
wi = 39578615; title = "Edward Said and the Post-Colonial" Author = Bill Ashcroft & Hussein Kadhim
The 65 ver will return nothing for this wi. The demo cite returns two books, one which is the wi of that number, and the other that is the owi. If you click on the first entry on the demo site, it will make the call that I proposed with wi = 39578615 vs. stdnbr=39578615.
|
This is a strange degree of entitlement and hostility to bring to somebody who made you something for free. It is a very reasonable expectation for DaltonST to ask that bug reports be made from a current version of the software and instead of simply doing so, you chose to be argumentative. If you are as competent as your bug report makes you seem, why not patch the bug yourself, and contribute your patch, instead of talking down and making demands?
If I were supporting free software, and a user responded to such a request with hostility and entitlement, I would be demotivated to continue supporting that software, too.
DaltonST: whatever your future plans are, thanks again for all the work you've already put into this tool.