Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynevans
They're a "online tech publication", and as such, I'm less than convinced that they're under the remit of the PCA. I'd think that you'd be unwise to trust that the authors don't have their own agendas, one of which will almost certainly be that a certain amount of controversial material will help boost the page-stats...
|
Perfectly true, but do you not think that the only English-language reporter at the trial, a self-confessed "copyright activist", equally has an agenda to promote in his reporting of the trial and the issues involved? Nothing about this affair, I'm afraid, is "balanced and neutral".