Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth
Sometimes, if it's not a pet page or "supposedly controversial", you can edit/fix Wikipedia. Surprised me how often you can't fix absolutely wrong information on it. However it's about the same level of accuracy as most historic now out of print because of Wikipedia encyclopedias and usually more accurate than news websites, even of established newspapers.
"A lie gets around the world before the truth gets its boots on". |
Which is exactly my point. God forbid you don't agree with some "official line" from the Wikipedia Gods of Decision-making. Those that appoint themselves the Wiki_PTB. It's infuriating.
And the same thing could be true here with AI/ChatGPT. I asked ChatGPT--version 4, mind you--a question this morning and not once but twice,
it gave me utterly incorrect answers. I mean, UTTERLY incorrect.
The question was, does a browser-based or API-providing ePUB reader exist with annotation and exporting same annotations capability exist? The first set of wrong answers was Calibre, ADE, Apple Books and Google Play books. I know factually that the first 3 are wrong. When I told it that those answers were wrong, it persisted in then correcting itself and telling me that you could annotate and export from Calibre, Edge, Readdle and Bookari. Only the last one is
REMOTELY right, and Edge's built-in ePUB reader was killed by MSFT.
NOT inspiring.
Hitch