Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeSteve
Some books contain big chunks of text in italics [...]. Or a character's thoughts might be italicized [...]. [...] If you enclose the word to be stressed in <em> tags, it will be italicized and appear indistinguishable from the text that surrounds it.
|
Like Hitch/Turtle said, it's like an ON/OFF switch.
So if there's an <em> or 2nd <i> inside of an outer <i>, then the text would be Roman/normal (straight-up-and-down).
Use this CSS:
Code:
i em { font-style: normal; }
i i { font-style: normal; }
and see
me answering that exact question back in 2020:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex2002ans
In Fiction, Styles are also important when marking inner thoughts or "telepathic speaking":
Code:
<span class="innerthought">Wow, I did <em>not</em> do good at all.</span>
Note: Italics within italics = not italic (Normal/Roman).
What usually happens is you get this in your Word->HTML:
Code:
<i>Wow, I did</i> not <i>do good at all.</i>
Ultimately, you would want to aim towards HTML like this:
Code:
<i class="innerthought">Wow, I did <em>not</em> do good at all.</i>
|
Like I mentioned in
Post #16 of this thread, it's easier to imagine it with a different color highlight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeSteve
A question from a person who knows very little about such things (i.e., me):
|
This is the ultimate and simplest explanation:
If you're further interested in this <i> vs. <em> stuff, please visit those previously linked topics.
Then do a search for:
My posts did a thorough job breaking down all the questions/examples + describing differences between all the cases:
- Book Titles
- Inner Thoughts
- Ship Names / Newspapers
- "Foreign" words
- Mathematics
- Citations
- Transcripts
- [...]
- - -
Side Note: Here's one more topic to toss on the reading list too:
- - -
Side Note #2: This <i> vs. <em> "debate" gets rehashed about once a year, with more and more evidence piling up.
Since 2017, there were about 7 in-depth MobileRead topics with
tons of examples (and discussions).
The last few built up upon the previous years, so instead of rehashing the same examples again and again, I summarized+brought even more each time.
So when you read that certain people have "NEVER heard of such a case" or have "NEVER seen an example", do not believe them.
They were a part of those discussions, and they've repeated the same exact things about a dozen times.
(And many times it already got answered earlier in the SAME EXACT topic!)