View Single Post
Old 04-07-2023, 04:50 PM   #8
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 79,882
Karma: 146918083
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth View Post
<em> should ONLY be used for emphasis. I've seen entire books by the House of Random Penguins where the author is dead and they simply use <em> and <strong> where the paper print had italics and bold, and that's simply delusional. Maybe sometimes you can tell the semantic intention from reading the paper text of a dead author, but mostly you can't.
There's no difference in look using <em> or <i>. How would you know which the paper edition used?

Same difference with <strong> and <b>.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote