View Single Post
Old 04-01-2023, 09:41 PM   #235
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,779
Karma: 169712580
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by hildea View Post
Huh, I find that hard to believe. Who had the authority to "not allow" it?

There's no ban (either legal, cultural, or practical) against films where all enslaved characters are played by Black actors.

Or do you mean that they couldn't find investors? And that this difficulty may have been (in part) because of how the book portrays slavery? That's a lot easier to believe.
As far as I remember from the item, the major issue was the investors having qualms over the portrayal of slavery in the book preventing the movie from being able to reach profitability. The colour green rules!
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote