View Single Post
Old 03-31-2023, 05:53 AM   #210
pdurrant
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pdurrant ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pdurrant's Avatar
 
Posts: 74,703
Karma: 318206216
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
In the U.S., books from the era in question are generally subject to a 95 year copyright period. Because of that, in January, one or two Agatha Christie books usually pass into U.S. public domain. Do the changes discussed here reset that clock? And in Life + 70 countries, should the lead on the team which made the book more sensitive to modern ears AKA bowdlerized be a co-author resetting that clock?
I'm not saying that some publisher won't try that, but I would hope the courts would throw out the case. Editorial changes are not generally considered to change the copyright status of a work.
pdurrant is offline   Reply With Quote