View Single Post
Old 03-28-2023, 09:12 PM   #174
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,426
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Especially considering it isn't just Dahl, but also Dr. Suess, and Ian Fleming, and now Agatha Christie, I'm wondering if there are copyright implications, or (if I can say this without sounds paranoid) motivations.

In the U.S., books from the era in question are generally subject to a 95 year copyright period. Because of that, in January, one or two Agatha Christie books usually pass into U.S. public domain. Do the changes discussed here reset that clock? And in Life + 70 countries, should the lead on the team which made the book more sensitive to modern ears AKA bowdlerized be a co-author resetting that clock?

I can see there being two versions soon, the free one based on the original and the copyrighted version purchased by schools and sensitive souls.
SteveEisenberg is online now   Reply With Quote