View Single Post
Old 03-28-2023, 06:57 PM   #55
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,709
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth View Post
They shouldn't need ANY official notification when a title is obviously copyright and it's flagged.
"Shouldn't need" is not a legal argument. The onus has always been on the rights holder to protect their copyright by reporting violations. This is not new. The DMCA takedown procedure IS the legal mechanism rights holders need to use to remove online content (if they don't wish to sue). IA is not responsible for doing this process for them.

I happen to think rights holders shouldn't need to do this either. But in the real--legal--world, "shouldn't need to" is quite meaningless. Until laws change, only doing what you shouldn't need to do will ever move the needle.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 03-28-2023 at 07:11 PM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote