View Single Post
Old 03-25-2023, 03:25 AM   #128
rcentros
eReader Wrangler
rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rcentros's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,911
Karma: 52566355
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Voyage
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
No, an ebook is a book (and remains an book until it isn't, file is erased or storage is destroyed).

I don't see how this differs from an ebook.
Except it's not a book on its own. It needs an additional component — a computer — to simulate a book. There is a reason why "eBooks" are called eBooks instead of simply "books" — it's because they are different. Nobody can receive an eBook on a thumb drive and read it without some kind of computer. Books, on the other hand, are complete. I can lend a book to someone without a computer or eReader and they can read it. Not so with an eBook.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
So if I give someone an ereader with a single ebook on it, then you have a book.
At that point you're giving me an eReader AND an eBook, which together simulate a book. You'll notice that eBook readers also simulate turning pages (they're even numbered) but you aren't actually turning pages. A simulation is not the same as reality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
Why does that matter I thought part of your argument is:

A book doesn't have words either. It has strokes that are interpreted as glyphs. Or has dots of ink that are interpreted as glyphs. Or toner that is interpreted as glyphs, ...
Glyphs form letters, letters form words. Toner does not "interpret" glyphs, or anything at all. It has no ability to reason. I think you're reaching here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
I have no problem with the dictionary definition of book. Here is another one:

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...y/english/book
Published maybe, but it still doesn't stand on its own. In other words an eBook is different than a paper book.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
But if you are talking about a book on MR, or in a modern context, "a book is a pbook" seems like an archaic definition.
Except no one in the "real" world refers to a book as a "pbook." They refer to a paper book as a book and an electronic book as an ebook.

Again, I'm not trying to denigrate eBooks. I almost exclusively read eBooks now. I'm just trying to explain why a lot of people consider a book (a paper book) a "real" book. There is a difference. Playing with the terminology doesn't change that fact.

Last edited by rcentros; 03-25-2023 at 03:33 AM.
rcentros is offline   Reply With Quote