View Single Post
Old 03-09-2023, 06:22 PM   #6
enuddleyarbl
Guru
enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.enuddleyarbl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
enuddleyarbl's Avatar
 
Posts: 784
Karma: 1538394
Join Date: Sep 2013
Device: Kobo Sage
I've removed those GBS anchors without problem.

I'll also note that the <div> and <figure> tag also suffer the same lack of Beautification if there's an <a></a> tag in there with an image (I usually see it between the <div> or <figure> start tag and the <img> start tag it contains. For instance:
Code:
<div id="fig_1"><a></a><img src="../images/00005.jpeg" alt="Thror's Map" class="imgfull"/></div>
will not beautify (ditto for the <figure> version). But, delete the <a> tag pair and it beautifies just fine.

Last edited by enuddleyarbl; 03-09-2023 at 07:05 PM.
enuddleyarbl is offline   Reply With Quote