View Single Post
Old 03-07-2023, 05:46 AM   #1757
Quoth
Still reading
Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Quoth's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,348
Karma: 105899727
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper
Quote:
Originally Posted by hyegeek View Post
They do not (or at least should not) have the right to change the deal after the sale.

While that is essentially what the "contract" says when you purchase something that is DRMed, contract law should not recognized a unilateral change to a contract as being valid.

DRM should have been ruled invalid years ago, but our courts are no better than our vendors.
Contracts are subsidiary to any local laws. Contracts themselves are not law. Contract Law is the civil law surrounding suing people that break your contract. A "retail" point of sale contract can be the most easily invalid. Business to Business contracts are more easily enforced as there is usually due diligence, lawyer's advice and explicit signing. Sometime B2B contracts are invalid too.

Unilateral changes are hardly ever valid.
Quoth is offline   Reply With Quote