Quote:
Originally Posted by gmw
First, what's the point of a publisher if they're not going to check over submissions? These days one of their self-proclaimed reasons for being is to act as a gate-keeper and filter.
Second, I don't think that a 'Does this plot make any sense' check helps you separate AI from human - seems to me I've come across plenty of (assumed) human texts with nonsense plots.
Third, take a look at the the earlier critique of the ChatGPT example and tell me you've never seen the same criticisms of human text. Indeed that post also critiqued another post too, on not dissimilar lines, and yet I give Quoth the benefit of the doubt as regards being human.
Panic may be inappropriate, but there is certainly enough going on in this space to make it interesting to watch. |
My point was that it's hard enough to read through a pile of human written dreck to get to the one decent work, adding an pile of A.I. written dreck will lead to the slush pile growing faster then the slush readers can possibly read.
It matters not if the regurgitation of half digested material gathered from dubious sources is A.I. produced or lovingly crafted at home by human hands and mind, what matters is the sheer amount of the stuff.