Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth
No, it's nonsense.
The name is inspired by the biology. They are nothing like at all in operation. It's AI industry propaganda.
We don't really know how vision exactly works. It's nothing like a camera feeding a computer. A computer neural network is a kind of database structure. It doesn't work at all like biological systems which are still poorly understood. It's just "AI industry" jargon.
Go do a real course in programming rather than reading industry sponsored articles. The Register https://www.theregister.com/ is more reliable than many other sources and it's only a tech news site. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg
Reading the ChatGPT passage in #25 slowly, several times, I see that.
But on first reading, not so much. I'd like to think that if ChatGPT wrote a mystery novel in the style of one of my favorite authors, I'd soon realize the plot and characterizations were only superficially plausible -- but I'm not sure. Human author plot errors get by me, so why not machine mistakes? And, getting back to #25, if I was an English composition teacher, I think it would at least get a B. |
Can either of you point out the bits that were nonsense please, for my edification?
Andrew