View Single Post
Old 02-20-2023, 02:05 PM   #43
Catlady
Grand Sorcerer
Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Catlady's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,419
Karma: 52613881
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
Quote:
Originally Posted by CathyA View Post
Lest anyone think this is some new trend ... I still remember when I found a first edition of an early Nancy Drew in a pile of old books and picked it up to reread. I was about 13 then (it was the mid-1970s) and I had grown up on the 1950s/60s editions of the books. The racism in the 1930s edition was completely unexpected and very shocking.
The Nancy Drew revisions eliminated overt racism and socioeconomic stereotypes by eliminating characters who weren't white and middle class--what's worse, being represented by a negative stereotype, or being erased? They also fed gender stereotypes by eliminating Nancy's independent rebellious streak--turning her into a more feminine, obedient, rule-following teenager. And they sucked a lot of the flavor out of the stories, dumbed down the reading level, and shortened the stories.

Since Nancy was the product of a conglomerate, the conglomerate had the right to modify its own creation. It's much for offensive for an individual author's work to be changed to fit some new criteria.
Catlady is offline   Reply With Quote