View Single Post
Old 04-16-2009, 09:39 AM   #287
sirbruce
Provocateur
sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
sirbruce's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,859
Karma: 505847
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Device: Kindle Touch, Kindle 2, Kindle DX, iPhone 3GS
Quote:
Originally Posted by astra View Post
So is it a normal or a normal-period dress? I thought that her remark about the dress indicated that this a dress of a particulat style/colour that she would dress during periods only. I have never heard about it and thought maybe someone can enlight me. Then her remark was true. Because if she was pointing to the fact that she has a dress, thus she is not he, then it was faaaaaaar from obvious. I didn't even consider her pic as a pic of a lady, just some sort of sexless animal/scarecrow in a some sort of dress.
Perhaps English is not your first language?

1. A "period dress" refers to a style or fashion associated with a particular time; i.e. 19th century, not a garment worn during mensturation. (Quick side-note: the word "period" with reference to menstruation is *rarely* used during casual conversation, so unless it's obviously a direct reference in context, you can usually assume it means something else.)

2. What she meant is pretty obvious to must people. She could have just said "dress" and meant the same thing. She was simply pointing out that it was a "period" dress appropriate for the apparent age and style of the photo. But the point was her avatar was wearing a dress, so she's a she.

3. Animals aren't sexless, so if you see a dog in men's clothes you can usually assume it's a male and a dog in a dress you can assume it's female. There is an underlying issue here that one cannot assume one's avatar is meant to be a reflection of one's RL self. But that again is part of the intended joke of this whole exchange; catsittingstill had no way of knowing if krisk was male or female, and krisk is suggesting humorously she was "obviously" female since her avatar is wearing a dress (and thus female).

Last edited by sirbruce; 04-16-2009 at 10:30 AM.
sirbruce is offline