View Single Post
Old 04-16-2009, 08:43 AM   #334
Sparrow
Wizard
Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sparrow ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,395
Karma: 1358132
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Device: Palm TX, CyBook Gen3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
Should statisically sicker peple pay more? Yes. But if no insurer will maintain a high-priced high risk pool, access becomes meaningless...
Should perfectly healthy people pay more if they're genetically at higher risk of developing certain conditions?
I think there is a lot of resistance in Europe to letting insurance companies have access to that type of information.
Cherry picking has too big a downside.
Sparrow is offline   Reply With Quote