View Single Post
Old 02-12-2023, 05:50 PM   #69
icallaci
Guru
icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.icallaci ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 819
Karma: 6528026
Join Date: Sep 2012
Device: Kobo Elipsa
Quote:
Originally Posted by j.p.s View Post
I agree that fiction can be a better vehicle for ideas than non-fiction, but disagree that non-fiction is inherently a "simple recitation of facts".
I phrased that badly. I enjoy both fiction and nonfiction. However, I prefer my nonfiction to stick to verifiable facts. I dislike nonfiction that speculates about a person's state of mind or motive or presumed interior dialogue. I dislike nonfiction that reaches conclusions without a firm basis in documented sources. Speculation is what fiction does well. Facts are what nonfiction does well (one hopes). As for those fiction books that are "based on fact," I usually end up doing a ton of research in an attempt to separate fact from fiction in my head, and end up driving myself crazy.

Last edited by icallaci; 02-12-2023 at 11:07 PM.
icallaci is offline   Reply With Quote