View Single Post
Old 02-08-2023, 04:09 PM   #51
Quoth
Still reading
Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Quoth ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Quoth's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,164
Karma: 105212035
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ireland
Device: All 4 Kinds: epub eink, Kindle, android eink, NxtPaper
Older USB are not full duplex and USB 3.x likely has its own funky definition of full duplex and what gadgets can do is another story.
Quote:
What part of "Simultaneous bi-directional data flows" don't you understand?
True full duplex is simultaneous transfers in both directions at exactly the same instant. Even when the communications medium supports it, it may not in practice be used. File transfer between journaling file systems will alternately transmit and receive. WiFi is usually half-duplex as the same channel is used both ways, but a lot of Mobile phone systems use separate parts of the band for uplink and downlink.


But the point is that having a USB-C connector on a brand new ereader tells you nothing about if it's USB 2.x or USB 3.x, or what speed it goes.

Of course some things go very fast and can use USB 3.x if the cable and both ends support it.

Also if a gadget is USB 3.x you need a compatible cable and either a blue USB 3.x USB-A socket (looks like regular kind and is backwards compatible to ordinary USB-A plugs used on USDB -A sockets using USB 1.x to 2.x.).

I was only giving some strange examples.

Last edited by Quoth; 02-08-2023 at 04:20 PM.
Quoth is offline   Reply With Quote