View Single Post
Old 04-15-2009, 02:03 PM   #260
wodin
Illiterate
wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
wodin's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,279
Karma: 37848716
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Sandwich Isles
Device: Samsung Galaxy S10+, Microsoft Surface Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenophon View Post
Actually, I've done that analysis. The scheme I was recommending is certainly not completely resilient in the face of a 20-year bear market, but it comes close. You need to consider a few things to understand this:
It's called dollar cost averaging.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Dollar cost averaging is the practice of investing a fixed dollar amount at regular intervals (such as monthly) in a particular investment or portfolio, regardless of its share price. In this way, more shares are purchased when prices are low and fewer shares are bought when prices are high. Dollar cost averaging is also called DCA and constant dollar plan in the US, pound-cost averaging in the UK, and by the currency-neutral term cost average effect.

Some financial advisors such as Suze Orman claim that DCA reduces exposure to risk associated with making a single large purchase.
It's a well know and effective investing stratagy.
wodin is offline   Reply With Quote