View Single Post
Old 04-15-2009, 11:27 AM   #232
zerospinboson
"Assume a can opener..."
zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
zerospinboson's Avatar
 
Posts: 755
Karma: 1942109
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Local Cluster
Device: iLiad v2, DR1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow View Post
I find, as I grow older and more cynical, that I'm developing a fondness for the Victorian notion of the deserving and the undeserving poor.
But question is: Why should the undeserving rich have to suffer less than the undeserving poor?
Cynicism and misanthropy are just words; the trick is being consistent and fair in applying them. Focussing only on the poor means being unreasonably selective (either because you don't know how to fix it or because you've just become jaded and have stopped caring at all). You can still be a cynic and be engaged, you know
Either they got a better education (from their parents) that they squandered, or they inherited money that they would've never made, but in either case they're better off than the undeserving poor.

Last edited by zerospinboson; 04-15-2009 at 11:30 AM.
zerospinboson is offline   Reply With Quote