Quote:
Originally Posted by ZodWallop
This seems like a disingenuous misrepresentation of that earlier argument. I don't believe anyone said that 'so long as a library served its romance patrons it was doing its job'.
|
That’s essentially what this post said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by meeera
I'm still not seeing the unfairness. Those category romances are probably about $4-7 also (that's retail; not sure of library package deals), while your academic history is going to cost a fair bit more, for many fewer checkouts. As you say, they're catering for their readers.
|
I.e., catering for only a subset of readers. Which had been my point.