Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb
Given that CD at 16/44 is already massively superior to vinyl in every way, then 24/96 obviously will be too.
While 24/96 will clearly be technically better than than 16/44, I doubt the difference would actually be audible in practice when used as the delivery format. There are valid arguments for using higher resolutions during mixing and other processing, so that rounding errors don’t add up etc., I don’t see any reason to go beyond 16/44 for final delivery.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
I'm going to disagree that 16/44 is better then vinyl in every way. It's not. It's better in some way, but I've heard plenty on LP that sounds better then CD.
24/96 is better then 16/44. I have a number of 24/96 recordings and some do sound really good.