View Single Post
Old 12-16-2022, 12:17 PM   #141
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 772
Karma: 9999999
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by theducks View Post
Vinyl does not have the hard frequency cutoff that CD's do.
CD has a 44KHz sample rate (split between Stereo Channels)
CD has 44.1KHz sampling of each channel independently - it's not split between channels.

Quote:
The overtones (on things like chimes) are lost early on CD.
The only overtones that are lost due to CD's sampling are those that you can't hear anyway (unless you're very, very young, and even then probably not).

In comparison with CD, vinyl also has:
- worse dynamic range
- worse signal-to-noise ratio
- worse stereo separation
- more harmonic distortion
- more wow and flutter

Some people may prefer the "sound" of vinyl, but that's just because they enjoy the sound of the inaccuracies and distortion of vinyl. If the question is which one most accurately reproduces the original signal, CD wins comfortably - it's not even close.
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote