View Single Post
Old 11-10-2022, 07:04 PM   #25
Tex2002ans
Wizard
Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,306
Karma: 13057279
Join Date: Jul 2012
Device: Kobo Forma, Nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetterRed View Post
That's because en-AU, en-CA and en-ZA are absent in the default en-GB and en-US dictionary locale files, but present in the Apache Office sourced dictionary locale files - and there are dic and aff files for each.

But why isn't en-CA in the en-US default dictionary locale file, yet en-PH is in it; and why aren't en-AU and en-ZA in the en-GB default dictionary locale file, yet en-BZ, en-NZ, etc are in it. And if Ghana, why not Nigeria and Kenya?
I've written quite a few in-depth posts in the LibreOffice subreddit about English dictionary files. (Here's the one from yesterday):

Different variants are taken care of by different people.

So... why is there no BZ + other variants?

Probably because nobody has decided to create/maintain them... so until someone steps up and does quality work, it won't exist in other programs.

- - -

Side Note: If you want more info on generating such dictionary, see the talk from:

where he described creating a new Czech dictionary.

Last edited by Tex2002ans; 11-10-2022 at 11:44 PM.
Tex2002ans is offline   Reply With Quote