Quote:
Originally Posted by hildea
so the machine learning is looking at our to-read-piles instead of (or in addition to?) our reading history. At first glance, that seems reasonable, but I tend to be more ambitious when planning what future me should read than when deciding what current me is going to read  So I have a lot more non-fiction books and heavy-ish books in my to-read-pile than in my reading history. |
I see. Yes, that way of finding recommendations is not going to work that well for me either. I have books on my to-read list that go way, way back and don't really reflect my reading preferences now. And I'm sloppy. Some of my to-reads are on GR/SG, and some just go right onto my Amazon wishlist.