View Single Post
Old 11-08-2022, 03:58 PM   #48
chaley
Grand Sorcerer
chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 12,449
Karma: 8012886
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Notts, England
Device: Kobo Libra 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by ownedbycats View Post
For one specific case, I have a 'Cleanup' search that encompasses several subsearches, which also execute subsearches — it's less cumbersome than all queries in one search, and lets me narrow down issues.

Code:
(search:"=Cleanup.Identifier Issues")
OR (search:"=Cleanup.Misc Issues")
OR (search:"=Cleanup.Missing Metadata")
If I wished to avoid double-entries, that means I couldn't just click on 'Cleanup' or 'Cleanup.Missing Metadata' and would have to instead check all of these individually for issues:
He is suggesting that the top-level "Cleanup" search be renamed "Cleanup.All" (or some such). This would move the search into the menu instead of it being duplicated at the top level. By picking the right name it would also appear at the top of the list. Instead of this
Click image for larger version

Name:	Clipboard01.png
Views:	72
Size:	28.0 KB
ID:	197608

you would get this
Click image for larger version

Name:	Clipboard02.png
Views:	64
Size:	24.5 KB
ID:	197609

This method puts the results in the hands of the user, getting the layout you want.
chaley is offline   Reply With Quote