View Single Post
Old 10-27-2022, 05:56 PM   #22
BionicGecko
Fanatic
BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BionicGecko ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BionicGecko's Avatar
 
Posts: 516
Karma: 5555555
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Czech Republic
Device: Voyage, Oasis, Scribe, Colorsoft, Libra Colour
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
To me, a copy of the book on your computer litteraly means keeping a borrowed book past their return date.
Well I’d argue it’s not exactly quite the same, as if you keep a borrowed book, no one else can read it, while keeping a de-DRMed copy after expiry does not prevent someone else from borrowing the book.

But obviously this is a complex topic where we try to apply the logic of physical things to digital ones. Keeping a copy of a borrowed digital book is not the same as keeping an actual book, as there is no concrete “loss” down the line. One could argue that the copy represents a lost sale, but it’s not quite the case - the person who copied the book would probably not have bought it anyway. There is no scarcity in the digital world, and trying to force such a scarcity results in a model which breaks at the seams.

I obviously believe authors should be rewarded for their work; I just think that trying to apply physical constraints to the digital world is an endeavor bound to fail.
BionicGecko is online now   Reply With Quote