Thread: Seriousness Cold Fusion - To Be Or Not To Be
View Single Post
Old 04-13-2009, 03:36 AM   #22
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenophon View Post
That matches my recollection also. I was curious because Harry's statement didn't seem to match that. Which might mean I didn't read/understand correctly, or the he knows something I don't, or... So I asked.
Sorry, I think you may have misunderstood me. I simply meant that Pons and Fleishman were "reputable" scientists, and that nobody (AFAIK) is suggesting that they "faked" their results. There may indeed have been some flaw in their apparatus or measuring equipment which resulted in a spurious indication of a temperature rise; but they were not falsifying their data. I am very aware that nobody has been able to successfully reproduce those results subsequently.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote